What can “imaginizing the future” do for you? Where, and how, does imagination help envisage very different futures? Who works on this kind of ideas, of methods, of stories?
Below is a VERY uncomprehensive, yet already rich mindmap. Comments and additions welcome!
>> Download this fairly large map (pdf; links should be operational)
“Exigez l’automatisation totale ! Exigez le revenu universel de base ! Exigez le futur !”
L’automatisation croissante des tâches et des métiers, même intellectuels et relationnels, vous inquiète ? Dans Accélérer le futur – Post-travail & post-capitalisme (Cité du design & it, 2017 ; titre original : Inventing the Future, 2015), Nick Srnicek et Alex Williams vous proposent de changer de perspective : et si l’automatisation totale, délibérée, était le chemin vers la vraie émancipation, celle qui nous libèrerait du travail et par là-même, de toute forme d’exploitation ?
Depuis 2 ans, l’association PopFinance conclut ses Rencontres du Crowdfuding en Méditerranée par une session “Finance fiction“.
“Finance-Fiction a la volonté de remettre au coeur du débat l’imagination dans le discours économique en intégrant des visions de possibles pour construire le réel de demain. Le format est dynamique en speech debout, similaire aux TED, où des invités éclectiques vont nous transporter à travers des thèmes aussi variés que la blockchain, la dette, la musique, la voile, la e-santé, la permaéconomie…” Patrick Le Camus, co-Fondateur de Popfinance
Organized by Aquitaine Europe Communication, directed and curated by myself and Daniel Erasmus, Ci’Num was a global, multicultural, 3-year foresight process (2005-2007) which intended to shed a new light on the future of our digital civilizations, taking into account geopolitical, cultural and economic differences. Our focus was:
- on the specific contribution of, and challenges related to, the emergence of ubiquitous and “intimate” technologies stemming from the convergence between nanotech, biotech, IT and cognitive science;
- on the social appropriation and production of technology;
- and on the ways, tools and methods through which we become empowered to shape our personal and collective futures – i.e., not on figuring out the most likely futures, but in recognizing uncertainties and looking for ways to maximize choices and opportunities in any given future.
At the request of Melbourne’s Deakin University, in 2016, the Canadian writer and journalist Cory Doctorow wrote an interesting story on how the real-world development of self-driving cars could go really, really wrong.
As Doctorow himself puts it: “The story, Car Wars, takes the form of a series of vignettes that illustrate the problem with designing cars to control their drivers, interspersed with survey questions to spur discussion of the wider issues of governments and manufacturers being able to control the operation of devices we own and depend on.” (actually, the survey questions don’t really help “spurring discussions”, as Deakin professor Gleb Beliakov provides his own, unequivocal and somewhat laconic answer to all of them – you can, however, view the survey results here)
In the story, the interaction between highly intelligent self-driving software, rules and exceptions forced into the car systems by all kinds of authorities, and a well-planned act of behavorial hacking, forces most of the city’s car into behaving like a herd of frightened buffaloes driven over the edge of a cliff. All, but one cleverly (although illegally) software-hacked car. But of course, if you had the right to hack your car, and if everyone did it, the situation could get even worse. Or could it?
In 2312, first published in 2012 (French translation to hit the shelves in May 2017), SF writer and ecologist Kim Stanley Robinson (aka KSR) imagines a world where, after having (almost) desperately messed up its planet of origin, humanity expands by colonizing and “terraforming” the whole solar system…
… What, another of those stories? Not quite.